Argentina |
Brazil |
Chile |
England |
France |
|
|
As if some kind of law would require. But
in all of the observed ones, it was clear that they would not be plenty
useful in collisions at speeds above 20 km/h, much less in OFF CENTER
collisions, or IN ANGLE collisions which are the majority.
PHOTO 1: THE MAIN HORIZONTAL MEMBER, APPARENTLY VERY STRONG, IS MADE ON WOOD! THE LACK OF DIAGONAL BRACING ALSO SHOWS LACK OF KNOWLEDGE IN DESIGNING STRUCTURES, MUCH LESS , TO STAND IMPACTS.
PHOTO 2: AN ARTICULATION TO LIFT THE GUARD IN CASE OF BACKWARDS MANEUVERING IS AVAILABLE, BUT IT IS EVIDENT THE WEAKNESS OF THE HINGES THE HORIZONTAL MEMBER ITSELF, AND THE LACK OF BRACING CONNECTING TO THE CHASSIS. CONCLUSION: IT WILL NOT STAND CAR COLLISIONS AT LOW SPEED, MUCH LESS IN ANGLE OR OFF CENTER COLLISIONS.
PHOTO 3: TOTAL
IRRESPONSIBILITY! FROM THE DESIGNER, FROM THE OWNER AND FROM THE TRAFFIC
AUTHORITIES! WHAT DO THEY KNOW ABOUT COLLISION FORCES?
PHOTO 4: THIS
UNDERRIDE GUARD IS AS EFFICIENT AS ONE MADE BY A BOY, USING THE "MECCANO"
PIECES... ONE CAN SEE
BEFOREHAND WHAT THE TWO BLUE PROTUBERANCES WILL CAUSE TO THE CAR DRIVER
HEAD AFTER A COLLISION: THEY WILL BREAK HIS SKULL IN TWO PARTS, AND WILL
FILL THEM WITH GLASS PARTS FROM THE WINDSHIELD...
|